We all know what’s happening in the West right now, but what’s going to happen in the next decade or so in regard to the sexual marketplace? More importantly, how can a man plan for the changes that are coming? Fear not, my readers, for I am here to bring you in from the freezing cold of ignorance and fear into the fire-lit cabin of knowledge. Here are my prognostications for the coming years, based on current trends.
1) Increasing prevalence of polyamory, with moves to legalize polygamy. Not only has the “mancession” thrown a LOT of guys out of work, but with women making up the majority of college undergrads and graduates, the number of men being shut out from the middle class is increasing at a rapid clip. With women genetically hardwired to seek men that are higher in status, the depopulation of dudes from the professional classes is shrinking the number of men they are capable of being attracted to. As a result, the number of men who cut the mustard status-wise will be able to form their own harems. The West’s hypergamous purgatory is already coming into existence – for instance, John Edwards (hat tip: Roissy) is openly keeping his mistress in his house:
John Edwards will move the mother of his love child into his North Carolina neighborhood so he can help raise their 18-month-old baby, the National Enquirer reported Wednesday.
The Enquirer also reported that Elizabeth Edwards, who is stricken with cancer, was furious when her husband told her of his parenting plans.
I fully expect the nattering nabobs of negativism feminism to make a push for legalized polygamy. They’re already clamoring for polyamory, as shown (hat tip: Mark Richardson) in this Feministing post:
I’m currently in a relationship with a man I love dearly, and I have been for nearly 3 years. It’s going well, he’s marvelous, we get on great. There’s just one thing – this is a polyamorous relationship. He also has another girlfriend, who he’s been with for a long time. That in itself isn’t a problem. I knew about her before I entered into the relationship and I’ve never had a problem with polyamory, it suits me fine, we take suitable precautions in our sex lives and we’re always open and honest with each other about everything. The problem is in explaining this to my parents. My mother noticed that my boyfriend was listed as in a relationship with the other lady on a social networking site, and has the notion that she must be his ex and he just hasn’t changed his status. She keeps asking me why he’s still listed as being with her, I keep changing the subject but I want to be honest with her. I’m not sure if she’s ever come across the concept of polyamory and I really don’t know what her reaction will be at all. I want to convey that this relationship is every bit as committed as a monogamous one and just as loving. How do you go about explaining this kind of thing with no knowledge of the response you’ll get? What if the response is negative? Please help.
Answer their questions with patience. I also caution that words like polyamory may not work for the first conversation. Keep it simple. “Mom, I know you keep asking me about the woman who says she is in a relationship with Jack. They are in a relationship. I’ve always known about it. Jack and I are serious and committed and we see other people. We are open and honest with each other and this works really well for both of us.”
If she denigrates the relationship, I would point out ways that he has been great in the past. When he has been at family functions, when he has helped your family, how happy you are together.
And then, and this may be the most difficult part, let it go. It will take time for your mother to understand and accept this (just ask the majority of queer folks who eventually have accepting parents). Keep answering their questions, but also set boundaries. If either of them are rude to your boyfriend or questions his love for you, you can call a stop to that. Your relationship and partner deserves respect.
This is the last and most important part – prove them wrong by actions. Show them that for all of their preconceived notions of what a “real” relationship is, you and your man are happy and love each other. It takes time, but this will be the greatest convincer of all.
From Mr. Richardson’s post:
It also hints at the real preferences of the more serious feminists. The sexuality of men and women operates at different levels. At one level, male sexuality is naturally promiscuous and female sexuality is hypergamous (meaning that women have an instinct to be with the most dominant male). If human nature only operated at this level then monogamy would be exceptionally rare.
I wonder if there are serious feminists who have rejected the traditional family as patriarchal (or as an impediment to female autonomy) and who therefore seek to “liberate” female sexuality – which really means liberating the female instinct to hypergamy.
The family form which corresponds best to hypergamy is, of course, polygamy – as this gives the most women access to the small number of socially dominant men.
When the first high court declares polygamy legal, we can officially pound that last nail into civilization’s coffin.
2) The collapse of marriage. As a general rule, people don’t get married unless they can afford to. For example, marriage rates and birthrates tumbled during the Great Depression but exploded after the economy recovered following World War II. Men, already being dissuaded from marriage due to the feminist legal system, will definitely not bite once they’ve been economically devastated. Expect the rate of marriage to take a HUGE drop. Divorce will also fall, as marriage will be confined almost exclusively to the genteel upper classes.
3) Sex-motivated rage killings will continue unabated, at the rate of one every other year at the least. Young women will continued to be killed by their sociopathic lovers at the same rate.
4) The death of nightlife. It’s a given, in both mainstream culture and PUA circles, that bars and nightclubs are the primary venues in which men meet women and (hopefully) make sweet reproductive music. The problem is two-fold. One, bar-hopping and clubbing are money-intensive activities. If you’ve unemployed or have otherwise seen your income collapse, the nightlife budget is the first to go. As Roosh wrote a year ago:
I predict that in the next two years meeting girls in the cities hardest hit by the economy will be even more difficult for the average guy. With less disposable income girls are going to stay home more instead of going out. Empty bars and clubs mean guys will be more reliant on meeting girls through friends, family, Myspace, and work. There will be less pump and dumps as guys will want to keep what they managed to get, as they themselves are strapped for cash and meeting girls does cost money. The only guys immune will be those in college, who will graduate to a barren landscape—in more ways than one.
Swap “guys” with “girls” and you have, in a peanutshell, what’s happening.
The other point pertains to clubs only – namely, seducing a club girl is nearly impossible if you aren’t an apex alpha or close to it. The atmosphere of nightclubs, depending on flash and looks, is something most guys can’t play to. You need to have a certain look, style, and attitude to pull consistently or even occasionally in clubs, and even if they have good game elsewhere, the club is a gigantic stumbling block that most dudes can’t overcome.
Combine this with the priciness of nightclubs and the recession, and you have a recipe for total market collapse. I predict that the number of nightclubs in cities will fall by half at the least, as the long lines of betas standing in line for an hour and plunking down their dollars for cover charges all so they can dance to shitty music, drink obscenely overpriced liquor, and hit on girls who do not wanted to be fucked by them vanish. Bars will also be hit, but not as severely, as they cost less and appeal to a wider market.
5) An explosion of interest in day game. The advantages of day game are so obvious it’s a surprise no one’s pounced on it. When you pick up girls during the daytime, you don’t have to deal with their bitch shields on at full blast, their cockblocking friends (as many girls are alone), gameless idiots hitting on them and giving them unwarranted boosts to their self-esteem, and the general jackassery of nightlife. Not only that, but approaching girls during the day is way cheaper then going to a bar or club. And yet, googling “day game” turns up no worthwhile information from seduction community websites – they are exclusively oriented around nightlife.
Going hand in hand with the coming collapse of the nightlife industry, I predict that guys interested in getting their knobs polished will focus their efforts on swooping girls while the sun is shining. The guru who writes a complete handbook on day game will be laughing all the way to the bank, laughing so hard he’ll shit himself, as his recalcitrant competitors recede into the darkness of irrelevance.
So knowing all of this, how can you, the humble reader, put yourself in a position of power? I have but one tip: LEARN GAME. If you are interested in having a sex life at all, you MUST have game. If you want to get married and possibly make babies, you MUST have game. If you want to do anything aside from have a five-fingered pants party, you MUST have game. Game is more important than getting a promotion at your job, your college education, or ANYTHING else in this regard. As the Fifth Horseman says here:
Moderate competence in Game is easily worth about the same SMV as having a net worth of $2 million. This is a rough estimate. Furthermore, no one can tax your Game, swindle you out of Game, or steal your Game in divorce court (as long as you don’t let this sap your confidence as a human being).
I define moderate competence in Game as the following 5 steps :
***1) Regular, consistent, and somewhat effortless ability to do approaches to women who are 8s or higher. This is the most important point of all, as without approaches, you will not create the opportunities to practice ANY other part of Game. This is also the filter that blocks most novices from ever progressing.
2) Ability to qualify the woman, as well as identify and pass her own tests easily. Be the first to end the phonecall, always be leaving, other time constraints, etc. The ability to use the occasional well-placed neg is valuable too.
3) Ability to run comfort and rapport for the requisite 6-8 hours. Have a lot of interesting stories, games, and other things to run on her.
***4) Ability to bridge from Day 1 to Day 2, and minimize flakes. This is important as flakes are frustrating, demoralizing, and discouraging. A lot of guys are very close to the brass ring, but this derails them in their quest for Game.
5) Ability to run competent seduction Game, after you get her alone. This is where Ross Jeffries NLP can be extremely useful (but not mandatory by any means).
1) and 4) cause the biggest frustration, paralysis, and ‘giving up’, hence the asterisks. But a man who becomes pretty good at these 5 points is ahead of 98% of all men, and is on par with a Beta who has $2 million in net worth (and is ahead of such a Beta if that Beta has no game and is suckered easily by feminine manipulation).
The copulation arms race is at DEFCON 2, my friends. Learn game or be wiped out in the ensuing nuclear fires.
No comments:
Post a Comment